Government of Ontario| Skip Navigation Menu | Ministry of Transportation
Government of Ontario Central Site.Contact us for questions and comments.Search the Ministry of Transportation Web site.Site map for the ministry Web site.Version française de cette page.
Location: Ministry Home > Highway Management > Ottawa Queensway Study > Preliminary Alternatives Report

Preliminary Design Study and Environmental Assessment
Highway 417 (Ottawa Queensway), from Highway 416 to Anderson Road
G.W.P. 663-93-00   C.A. 4005-A-000090


Preliminary Alternatives Report

March 2004


Volume 1

Table of Contents

1.  

Introduction

 
2.

Identified Problems and Opportunities

2.1 Transportation Problems
2.2 Transportation Opportunities
 
3.

Assessment and Evaluation Methodology

3.1 EA Classification
3.2 Transportation Goals and Objectives
3.2.1 Provincial and Municipal Policies
3.2.2 Goals and Objectives for this Study
3.3 Evaluation Principles
3.4 Qualitative (Reasoned Argument) Method
3.5 Quantitative (Arithmetic) Method
3.6 Groups of Alternatives for Evaluation Purposes
3.7 Evaluation Factors and Sub-Factors
3.8 Factor and Sub-Factor Weights
3.9 Measures and Scoring
3.10 Sensitivity Testing Program
3.11 Selection of the Technically Preferred Alternative
 
   
4.

Alternatives to the Undertaking

4.1 Generation of "Alternatives to" the Undertaking
4.1.1 Initial Screening of Alternatives
4.1.2 Description of Alternatives Carried Forward
4.2 Assessment of "Alternatives to" the Undertaking
4.3 Recommended "Alternatives to" the Undertaking
 
5.

Alternative Methods

5.1 Introduction
5.2 Comments Received from the Public
5.3 Changes Made Following Public Consultation
5.4 Modifications to Alternative Methods by Section
5.4.1 Highway 417 Mainline - Kent Street to Metcalfe Street
5.4.2 Richmond Road Interchange - South Side
5.4.3 Island Park Drive Interchange
5.4.4 Metcalfe Street to Nicholas Street Interchanges
5.4.5 St. Laurent Boulevard Interchange - North Side
5.4.6 St. Laurent Boulevard Interchange - South Side
5.5 Preliminary Assessment of Factors Applicable to Alternative Methods

List of Figures

Figure 1 - Study Area Map
Figure 2 - Evaluation Flow Chart
Figure 3 - Sample Weighting of Factor Areas

List of Tables

Table 1 - Long List of Factors and Sub-Factors
Table 2 - Sample Weighting of Sub-Factors for Natural Environment Factor
Table 3 - Summary of Assessment and Evaluation of "Alternatives to" the Undertaking
Table 4 - Long List of Interchange Alternatives
Table 5 - Preliminary List of Applicable Factors / Sub-Factors for Each Alternative Group

Appendices*

Appendix A  -  Function Forms

Appendix B  -  Calculation of Weighted Score

* Note: These appendixes are not available online.

Volume 2: Alternative Plans

List of Plates



Glossary of Terms

Accessibility:
Ease with which people can reach their destinations. Ability to reach a desired destination at a reasonable cost with reasonable choices.
Alternative:
Well-defined and distinct course of action that fulfills a given set of requirements. The EA Act distinguishes between alternatives to the undertaking and alternative methods of carrying out the undertaking.
Congestion:
When the demand for travel on a portion of the transportation system is greater than the ability of that portion to handle travel efficiently.
Dichotomous Utility Function:
A utility function that represents a desirable or undesirable response (yes/no, present/absent, true/false).
Double Counting:
Unintentionally accounting for a particular condition more than once through the selection of a number of sub-factors and measures during the evaluation method.
EA:
Environmental Assessment
Dimensionless Number:
A number that does not have a measurement unit, such as length, associated with it. Examples include utility score and overall score.
Evaluation Process:
The process involving the identification of those factors, sub-factors and measures that help to distinguish between the alternatives under consideration, rating of predicted impacts, assignment of weights, and aggregation of weights to produce an ordering of alternatives.
Factor:
A component used to identify a particular consideration within each factor area. For example, under Natural Environment, factors could include wildlife, fisheries, vegetation and groundwater.
Factor Area:
A broad component of the environment such as Natural, Social, Economic, Cultural, used to group factors used during the assessment and evaluation of alternatives.
Function Form:
See Utility Function.
Linear Utility Function:
A function that can be defined using a linear equation of the form:
y = a + bx, where
y is the dependent variable (raw score);
x is the independent variable (measurement);
b is the slope of the function; and
a is the y intercept, normalized in this study to be equal to one or zero.
MTAC:
Municipal Technical Advisory Committee
Mitigation:
Taking actions that avoid, prevent, remove or alleviate to some degree the negative impacts associated with the implementation of alternatives.
Mobility:
Ability to satisfy the demand to move a person or goods. Reaching a desired destination with relative ease within a reasonable time.
Overall Score:
The final value of an alternative’s score derived at by summing all of the weighted scores.
PAC:
Public Advisory Committee
Performance Factor:
See Utility Function.
PIC:
Public Involvement Centre
Ranking:
The ordering of alternatives from first to last for comparison purposes.
Raw data:
The measurement of the impact, or measured data, under each measure/sub-factor.
Risk:
Probability that a given outcome will or will not materialize. Distinct from uncertainty in that the alternative outcomes are known or defined and that the probability of each is measurable.
Screening:
Process of eliminating alternatives from further consideration. Alternatives may be “screened out” if they do not address the identified problem/opportunity, if they do not meet specified conditions or requirements and/or if they would result in unacceptable impacts.
Step Function:
A function can be defined by several linear functions within separate ranges that have a slope equal to zero. For this study, two linear functions are used:
y = 1, for x = desirable
y = 0, for x = undesirable
Sub-factor:
Explicit feature or consideration used for comparison of alternatives. Each subfactor is grouped under one of the factors.
TAC:
MTO / TSH Technical Advisory Committee
TTC:
City of Ottawa Transportation and Transit Committee
Traceability:
Characteristics of an evaluation process that enables its development and implementation to be followed with ease by someone reviewing the work.
Utility Function:
A function (linear, step) that represents the utility score versus the sub-factor’s measurement or desirableness.
Utility Score:
The "y" value derived from the utility function of the measurement of the impact induced by a particular alternative’s sub-factor/measure (a number between 0 and 1).
Weight:
The importance attributed to a factor area, factor or sub-factor relative to others. The value of the weight is expressed in a percentage and the sum of all weights is equal to 100%. A range of weights is used to test the sensitivity of the result to the range of community values.
Weighted Additive Method:
The arithmetic method used in the evaluation of alternatives, which reduces the relevant measures into a dimensionless number for each alternative, suitable for comparison.
Weighted Score:
A raw score that has been multiplied by the factor weight.


Contents | Introduction | Problems & Opportunities | Assessment Methodology
Alternatives to the Undertaking | Alternative Methods



Last Modified: June 18, 2004