Traffic operations analyses were carried out as a supplement to the INTEGRATION modelling, and were used to provide an initial indication of problem areas, a check on the modelling results and a means of diagnosing operational deficiencies. The analysis examined each component of the Highway 417 corridor individually. As such it does not completely reflect interactions among the components (e.g., "metering" of flow into a highway section due to an upstream capacity constraint), but it facilitates identification of specific operational problems and quick testing of improvements.
The traffic operations analysis of the Highway 417 mainline was carried out according to the procedures of the Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 Edition (HCM). Calculations were performed using the Highway Capacity Software, Version 4.1c (HCS). The HCM procedures for freeways require that the facility be broken down into the following segments for analysis:
Signalized or unsignalized intersection analyses were also completed for all ramp terminal intersections and for certain key intersections near ramp terminals. The intersection analyses were generally completed using HCM procedures and HCS. Synchro 5 software was used for the analysis of five-leg intersections and intersections where accurate representation of actuated signal operations was required to match analysis results with actual operating conditions. For example, where the transitway intersects with Woodroffe Avenue, the bus signal is actuated and is only called when a bus is present. Synchro accurately represents the actuation pattern produced by the actual bus volumes, while HCS assumes actuation of the bus phase to its maximum green time on every cycle. The Synchro software can provide outputs similar to HCS for individual intersections, based on HCM procedures.
The HCM analysis methodologies incorporate several limitations that must be kept in mind when interpreting the results. The most important limitations include:
The results of the traffic operations analysis are stated in terms of level of service (LOS). The LOS is assigned on the basis of one or more measures of effectiveness generated by the analysis procedures; LOS definitions vary, depending on the type of facility being analyzed.
For all freeway facilities, including basic freeway segments, weaving sections and ramp influence areas, the HCM defines LOS in terms of density (passenger cars per lane km). Density provides a measure of drivers' ability to manoeuvre within the traffic stream. As density increases, drivers' ability to select their desired lane and travel speed is increasingly restricted and their comfort level is diminished. The HCM LOS definitions for basic freeway segments, weaving sections and ramp influence areas are summarized in Table 6.1.
| Density (passenger cars/km/lane) | ||||
| Level of Service | Basic Freeway Segment | Weaving Section | Ramp Infuence Area | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | ≤7 | ≤6 | ≤6 | Free-flow |
| B | > 7-11 | > 6-12 | > 6-12 | Minor manoeuvrability reduction |
| C | > 11-16 | > 12-17 | > 12-17 | Manoeuvrability restricted; speeds near free-flow |
| D | > 16-22 | > 17-22 | > 17-22 | Limited manoeuvrability; speeds decline; minor incidents cause queues |
| E | > 22-28 | > 22-27 | > 22 | Operation up to capacity; unstable - any incident causes major queues |
| F | > 28 | > 27 | * | Breakdown (demand > capacity); congested operation; within queue |
* Density not calculated at LOS F
For intersections, the HCM defines LOS in terms of average control delay per vehicle. Control delay is defined as the increased travel time of a vehicle approaching and passing through a signal or stop controlled intersection compared with a (theoretical) free-flow vehicle approaching and passing through the intersection with no control. The control delay ranges for each LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersections are summarized in Table 6.2.
| Average Control Delay (s/veh) | ||
| Level of Service | Signalized | Unsignalized |
|---|---|---|
| A | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| B | > 10-20 | > 10-15 |
| C | > 20-35 | > 15-25 |
| D | > 35-55 | >25-35 |
| E | >55-80 | >35-50 |
| F | >80 | >50 |
The existing and projected future levels of service (LOS) for all Highway 417 mainline sections (basic freeway segments, ramp merge/diverge areas, weaving sections) are summarized in tables provided in Appendix G. These tables list all of the mainline segments for each direction of travel, in the order in which a driver would encounter them, to assist in identifying LOS patterns and problem areas. The results are also summarized on the schematic maps in Appendix F.
The analysis of weaving sections, ramp influence areas and basic freeway segments indicated that the following sections of the Highway 417 mainline currently experience traffic operations problems:
The following is a summary of the most significant traffic operations problems indicated by the traffic operations analysis of the 2011 and 2021 traffic volume projections.
Westbound p.m. Peak Hour
For each basic freeway segment, ramp merge/diverge area and weaving section found to operate at LOS E or F in 2011 and/or 2021, additional HCS analysis was completed to determine the lane configuration that would restore operations to LOS D or better in each horizon year. LOS D is the lowest LOS at which stable operations can be consistently maintained and is used in planning as the desirable LOS for future (horizon year) conditions in urban areas. For each mainline section, all parameters in the HCS analysis were held constant and mainline and/or auxiliary lanes were added until an acceptable LOS was obtained. Auxiliary lanes include acceleration/deceleration lanes in merge, diverge and weave areas. Since the number of auxiliary lanes associated with a ramp must match the number of lanes on the ramp, the addition of an auxiliary lane generally implies a widening of the associated ramp(s).
The basic and auxiliary lane configurations determined by this analysis are summarized in Table 6.3 and Table 6.4, respectively. The results in these tables should be considered only as a general guideline. They do not reflect any changes to lane widths, shoulder widths or ramp terminal intersections that could supplement or be considered as alternatives to the addition of lanes. They also do not include any consideration of lane balance, traffic safety, ramp terminal intersection operations or traffic diversion to Highway 417 if capacity is made available. Additional analysis is required to assess the feasibility of adding lanes in the indicated locations, including a geometric design review, INTEGRATION modelling, a safety review and identification of environmental impacts.
| Section | Eastbound Basic Lanes | Westbound Basic Lanes | ||||
| Existing | 2011 Req'd | 2021 Req'd | Existing | 2011 Req'd | 2021 Req'd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highway 416 - Richmond | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Richmond - Pinecrest/Greenbank | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4* |
| Pinecrest/Greenbank - Woodroffe | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4* | 4* |
| Woodroffe - Maitland | 3 | 4* | 4* | 3 | 4* | 4* |
| Maitland - Carling | 3 | 4* | 5* | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Carling - Parkdale | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Parkdale - Rochester | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Rochester - Bronson | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Bronson - Kent/Lyon | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
|
Kent/Lyon
- O'Connor |
3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4* | 4* |
| O'Connor - Metcalfe | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Metcalfe - Nicholas | 3 | 4** | 4** | 3 | 4** | 4** |
| Nicholas - Vanier Pkwy. | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4* | 5* |
| Vanier Pkwy. - St. Laurent | 3 | 4* | 4* | 3 | 4* | 4* |
| St. Laurent - Ottawa 174 | 3 | 4* | 4* | 3 | 4 | 4** |
| Ottawa 174 - Innes | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Innes - Walkley | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Walkley - Hunt Club | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
* Additional accelerationp lane required for at least one merge area within this section.See Table 6.4 for details.
** LOS D operations could not be obtained with a total of 5 lanes in the weaving section.HCS cannot analyze a weave with more than 5 total lanes (basic + auxiliary).
| Location |
Additional Auxiliary Lane
First Required Horizon Year |
|---|---|
| Eastbound | |
| Woodroffe Avenue Ramp S-E merge | 2011 |
| Maitland Avenue Ramp N/S-E merge | 2011 |
| Metcalfe Street to Nicholas Street weave | 2011* |
| Vanier Parkway Ramp N-E merge | 2011 |
| Vanier Parkway Ramp S-E merge | 2011 |
| St. Laurent Boulevard Ramp N-E merge | 2011 |
| Westbound | |
| Pinecrest Road/Greenbank Road Ramp S-W merge | 2021 |
| Woodroffe Avenue Ramp N/S-W merge | 2011 |
| Maitland Avenue Ramp N/S-W merge | 2011 |
| O'Connor Street Ramp N-W merge | 2011 |
| Nicholas Street to Metcalfe Street weave | 2011* |
| Vanier Parkway Ramp N-W merge | 2011 |
| Vanier Parkway Ramp S-W merge | 2011 |
| St. Laurent Boulevard Ramp N-W merge | 2021 |
| St. Laurent Boulevard Ramp S-W merge | 2011 |
* Need for additional continuous auxiliary lane assumed, as LOS was E or F with additional basic lane and existing auxiliary lane. HCS cannot analyze weaving sections with more than 5 total lanes.
As noted in previous sections of this report, the extension of Nicholas Street south of Highway 417 (the Alta Vista Extension), with associated interchange modifications, was included in the TRANS model, but was not included in any traffic operations analysis or INTEGRATION modelling. Since the Alta Vista Extension is included in the City of Ottawa's Transportation Master Plan, a review of its potential impacts on the basic lane requirements for adjacent sections of Highway 417 was completed. A comparison of the 2021 p.m. peak hour TRANS travel demand forecasts for Highway 417 east and west of Nicholas Street with the extension (Scenario 2101) and without the extension (Scenario 2100) found that volume changes with the extension ranged from a decrease of 7.4% to an increase of 9.5%. For the critical eastbound p.m. peak hour volumes, the model indicated virtually no change west of Nicholas Street and a decrease of 7.4% east of Nicholas Street.
Applying the pattern of volume changes indicated by the TRANS model to the 2021 volume projections for the Highway 417 mainline east and west of Nicholas Street resulted in minimal change to the critical volumes (westbound a.m. peak hour and eastbound p.m. peak hour). This indicates that the addition of the Alta Vista Extension would not alter the basic lane requirements for the adjacent sections of Highway 417.
Depending on the ultimate configuration of the interchange, weaving, merging and diverging manoeuvres could produce capacity reductions that would result in needs for additional basic or auxiliary lanes. Should the Alta Vista Extension be implemented by the City of Ottawa, traffic operations analysis and simulation modelling will be required to determine the optimum lane configuration.
Table 6.5 summarizes the operational issues identified at ramp terminal intersections. Levels of service for all movements at all intersections analyzed are provided in Appendix G. The critical movements listed in the table are those found to be operating at LOS E or F. The listed year is the first year in which the operational issue was noted. As previously indicated, intersections found to have significant operational problems in a given year were not analyzed in subsequent years, on the assumption that the identified problems would only worsen. Operational improvements will be developed and analyzed to assess effectiveness at the 2021 planning horizon as part of the next stage of the Class EA Study.
The comments listed in the table identify the underlying condition that results in the operational problem, and can be used to distinguish between major and minor problems. Where a signal timing issue has been identified, the problem is considered to be minor, as it could potentially be corrected through a timing change (subject to confirmation of feasibility). Other issues (e.g., capacity, geometry) can be considered major problems, as they would require geometric modifications or other network improvements to be resolved.
| Intersection |
Peak
Hour |
Year |
Critical
Movement(s)* |
Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richmond Rd. / Bayshore Dr. / Hwy. 417 WB Off-Ramp | p.m. | 2001 | SBR; WBT |
|
| Pinecrest Rd. / Greenbank Rd. / Iris St. / Hwy. 417 EB Ramps | a.m. | 2001 | NBT to 417 EB; SBL; EBL |
|
| p.m. | 2001 | NBT WBR to 417 EB; NBR; EBL; EBR | ||
| Maitland Ave. / Hwy. 417 EB Ramps | a.m. | 2001 | SBL; WBL |
|
| p.m. | 2001 | SBL; WBL | ||
| Maitland Ave. / Hwy. 417 WB Ramps |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | NBL/T |
|
| Carling Ave. WB / Kirkwood Ave. | a.m. | 2001 | NBL |
|
| p.m. | 2001 | NBL; SBR; SBT | ||
| Carling Ave. EB / Kirkwood Ave. | a.m. | 2001 | EBT to 417 EB; NBR |
|
| p.m. | 2001 | NBR | ||
| Parkdale Ave. / Hwy. 417 EB Ramps |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | SBL |
|
| Parkdale Ave. / Westmount Ave. / Hwy.417 WB Ramps |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | SBT/R; WBL/T/R |
|
| Rochester St. / Raymond St. / Hwy. 417 WB On-Ramp |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | WBT/L |
|
| Rochester St. / Elizabeth St. / Hwy. 417 EB Off-Ramp |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | EBT/R |
|
| Bronson Ave. / Hwy. 417 EB Off-Ramp |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | EBR |
|
| Bronson Ave. / Catherine St. / RaymondSt. | a.m. | 2001 | NBL/T; SBT/R |
|
| p.m. | 2001 | NBT; SBT; WBT | ||
| Kent St. / Catherine St. / Hwy. 417 EB Off-Ramp / Chamberlain St. | a.m. | 2001 | NBL/T |
|
| O'Connor St. / IsabellaSt. / Hwy. 417 EB Off-Ramp | p.m. | 2001 | EBT |
|
| O'Connor St. / Catherine St. / Hwy. 417 WB On-Ramp |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | SBT to Hwy 417 WB |
|
| Metcalfe St. / IsabellaSt. / Hwy. 417 EB On-Ramp | p.m. | 2001 | NBR to Hwy 417 EB |
|
| Metcalfe St. / Catherine St. / Hwy. 417 WB Off-Ramp | a.m. | 2001 | Hwy 417 Ramp WBT/R; Catherine St. WBT |
|
| p.m. | 2001 | Hwy 417 Ramp WBT | ||
| Greenfield Ave. / Mann Ave. / Hwy. 417 WB On-Ramp | a.m. | 2021 | SBL (to 417) |
|
| Lees Ave. / Hwy. 417 EB Off-Ramp | p.m. | 2001 | SBL/R |
|
| Lees Ave. / Hwy. 417 WB Off-Ramp / Transitway | a.m. | 2021 | EBT; WBT |
|
| Riverside Dr. / Tremblay Rd. / Hwy. 417 EB Ramps |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | EBL; WBR |
|
| St. Laurent Blvd. / Lemieux St. | a.m. | 2001 | WBL |
|
| Labelle St. / Lemieux St. / Hwy. 417 WB Off-Ramp |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | WBT/R; EBL; EBT |
|
| Innes Rd. / Hwy. 417 EB Ramps | p.m. | 2001 | EBT; SBL |
|
| Walkley Rd. / Hwy. 417 EB Ramps |
a.m.
p.m. |
2001 | SBL |
|
| Walkley Rd. / Hwy. 417 WB Ramps | a.m. | 2001 | NBL |
|
* Movements operating with unacceptable average delays (LOS E or F), identified as follows:
|
NB = Northbound
SB = Southbound EB = Eastbound WB = Westbound |
L = Left turn
T = Through movement R = Right turn |
| For example, NBL/T means northbound left turn and through movements. | |
As part of the proposed improvements for Highway 417 west of Highway 416 (W.P. 458-98-00), the movement from Highway 416 northbound to Moodie Drive is to be precluded, to eliminate a hazardous weave. Traffic that currently makes this movement would instead exit Highway 416 at Holly Acres Road, turn left at the ramp terminal intersection, then use the existing westbound transit ramp (future Ramp S-W) to enter Highway 417 westbound and access the Moodie Drive exit.
At the time the ramp terminal intersection analysis was initially completed, this proposed traffic pattern change had not received final approval and detailed information was not available on the expected diversion volumes. Accordingly, the potential diversion of Moodie Drive traffic was not included in the initial analysis of the Holly Acres Road / Highway 416 NB / Highway 417 EB off-ramps intersection.
Information subsequently received from MTO indicated that the volume of traffic moving from Highway 416 northbound to Moodie Drive is approximately 30% of the total Highway 416 Ramp S-W volume in the critical a.m. peak hour. To estimate the potential future diversion volumes, this percentage was applied to the projected 2011 and 2021 ramp volumes, resulting in estimated a.m. peak hour diversion volumes of 390 in 2011 and 440 in 2021.
To test the effect of the proposed diversion on the Holly Acres Road ramp terminal intersection, the estimated diversion volumes were added to the projected eastbound left turn volumes for the corresponding horizon years. HCS analysis was completed using the revised turning movement volumes. The results show that the Holly Acres Road ramp terminal intersection would be able to accommodate the estimated diversion volumes if the eastbound lanes are re-designated to allow left and right turns from the centre lane and the signal timing plan is changed.
The requirements for accommodating diversion of the Highway 416 to Moodie Drive movement will be further considered in the assessment of alternatives for improvements to the Holly Acres Road ramp terminal intersection.
Contents | Summary | Introduction | Data Collection | Demand Forecasting | Traffic Volumes
INTEGRATION Modelling | Operations Analysis | Safety Review | Conclusions
This site is maintained by the Government of Ontario
Privacy | Important Notices | External Links Disclaimer
© Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2009
Last modified: January 22, 2009